Contempt of Court Ruling Against Condé Nast
The following replies are approved. To see additional replies that are pending approval, click Show Pending. Warning: These may contain graphic material.
1
So GQ published an article that could have influenced a jury to vote in a way prejudicial to the defendant, in this case Rupert Murdoch & Associates. Isn’t it the responsibility of the court to evaluate media presented to a sequestered jury, rather than rely on assurances of a media group to filter all content for them? Eh, this is too long to read but it isn’t worth being posted.
